Saturday, February 7, 2009

Lux!!!

I'm always a little dubious of blogs containing deep thoughts, but I woke up this (Saturday!!) morning at 5:00 thinking of Lux Interior. There have been a slew of passings lately - John Martyn, Mitch Mitchell, etc. - but this one struck me, not because of a profound sense of loss, but because of how much I hated him over the years.

If there has been one constant on the L.A. music scene as long as I can remember, it is the Cramps concert. It seems like every L.A. Weekly I've ever read has a huge picture of some crazed grinning zombie and the announcement of the Cramps playing at the Whiskey, or the Troubadour, or, lately, the Smell. And every time I saw one, it would remind me of what bugs me about music as much as anything - the triumph of the image over the music itself.

Of course this bugs a lot of people, and it may seem weird to focus this hatred on such a small-time band in the world of the Jonas Brothers. But there was something different about the Cramps. In my mind, what they always represented more than any other band, was the absolute contempt for what is, to me, the best thing about music: melody.

It's kind of embarrassing to admit, actually. Coming up through the attitude of punk and new wave. and then post-punk and into folk, there always seemed to be an understanding that the music is about something deeper than it's individual notes. And of course it is - anger, alienation, love, fun, sadness, craziness. But, what I have always, really, worshiped, is a great melodic line. The absolute perfection of "Johnny B. Goode" - try changing a note. The sublime "Strawberry Fields" and "Our House" (CSNY, not Madness, although that's not bad either). Straight to Hell - so good that it was almost ignored then, and is a big part of what is defining our era now (who knows this?), the amazingly intelligent "Free Man in Paris", the truly ridiculously amazing "Dancing Queen" - we watched Mamma Mia last night and how happy that crazy Swede must have been. God Only Knows.

Beethoven called melody, "the most noble aspect of music." Praise the Lord for rhythm, and you better write something deeper than, "Friday night and the lights are low," eventually, but it's the melody for me. John Lennon may or may not sit higher at the table than Paul Mccartney, but Kurt Cobain doesn't (it's all personal). Above all, it's the upward sweep: "But Johnny didn't care...", "Write you a letter tomorrow...", Garcia's Bird Song, Beethoven's 9th. Putting whatever gets you through the night into a few notes that rise up to Heaven.

Over the years, there have been plenty who, through whatever combination of some talent, looks, and persistence have made fortunes with a handful of mediocre melodies. The Britneys of the world. The lack of grace of , "Her name is Rio and she dances on the sand." That last note - the third of the sub-dominant chord - like sitting on an over-ripe tomato. Put a Ring On it and I'm out.

But the Cramps were different. They seemed to me to have a contempt for melody. A need to overcome it by attitude, volume, and Halloween. Poison Ivy wailing away like Chuck Berry with no Maybelline. I'm sure that it's not just an L.A. thing, but it kind of seemed like it. The Germs were the same way, and I see the same thing going into La Luz de Jesus and seeing for the billionth some artist substituting quasi-Day of the Dead weirdness for an ability to draw. Grump grump grump.

Anyway, the boys are up now and I don't wish Lux any badness. They were an L.A. band, and God bless us all. But Holmes had his sadness after Reichenbach Falls, and sometimes you just want to get things down. so there it is. I hope you all have a great weekend.

Peace & Love,

Patrick

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey Bud, I always enjoy your writing; it is melodic. Interesting piece this morning that will make a fun discussion when you're up again. Remember our discussions whey you were younger about the meaning of art? The discussions rages on.
Have a great day. Get a nap.
Dad

Anonymous said...

Patrick McGrumpacutty! I love how negative this posting is! Way to channel the dark side of my usual sunny sibling. Well, I totally agree with you...not really about The Cramps (I don't really know them beyond the monthly female type), but about music and melody. It's funny you just wrote this, as I was thinking this morning as I was listening to "Carey" that I really want to write an ode to Joni Mitchell posting. Maybe I will now that your tirade has inspired me!

"...oh, Carey get out your cane, and I'll put on some Silver!"

Amy

pdore said...

Please do - I would love to read it!!!
Also, thanks Dad!

Em said...

Okay, my love, I read this again. I thoroughly enjoyed it...but I still think that Eric may be the only person on the planet who truly understands it. Even after reading it again and knowing that 'Holmes' refers to Sherlock Holmes, I was still lost in the deep, dark, twisty quagmires of your mind. I agree with Amy, though. Whether I completely understood it, or not, it was nice to see the dark side of my sunny spouse. : )

Anonymous said...

Great posting...wait a minute, Mitch Mitchell died? Aw, man, now I'm down...

Jx

Eric said...

Okay Patrick,
Thanks for the easy target. First I will say, ‘kudos.’ It takes courage to put an opinion out there. That said, I will now attack the central point of your post. I enjoy a great melody, but damn, that ain’t all there is. The first exceptions that leap to mind: Iggy Pop and Burt Bacharach. Iggy is not known for his melodies. Johnny Rotten inspired millions with a vitriolic contempt for melody (okay, contempt for everything). Bacharach (or John Denver or Billy Joel) wrote very nice melodies, but leave me mildly nauseous. The difference? Conviction? Originality? Attitude? A certain je-ne-sais-quoi?
McCartney vs. Lennon. I would argue that McCartney was the marginally better melodymaker. But his songs invariably carry less weight for me than Lennon’s. I would say that Lennon had the emotional and intellectual weight going for him. A lot of that is in the voice, so I guess that can’t all be chalked up to songwriting. The Faces’ version of ‘Maybe I’m Amazed’ does kick the ass of Aerosmith’s ‘Come Together.’
Oasis vs. Blur. The Gallagher boys are naturals with melodies (at least for their first few albums) but have no depth and recycled attitude. Blur had depth and restlessness to burn, which for me translated into much more rewarding music. Maybe that’s it. It may be the restlessness that I love.
Okay. It’s late and I’m tired. I guess I don’t know exactly why, but I know that a tuneless Leonard Cohen kicks Graham Nash’s butt. I know that Liz Phair’s monotone gets me but Allison Krauss leaves me flat.
You’re right, though. The Cramps suck. I do, however, enjoy the term ‘Psychobilly.’
(Dropping Oingo, Mats, and Jerry into the same sentence deserves a kick in the shin. However, I seem to have no problem with your favorably comparing Elfman to Ludwig Van.)
All my love,

Em said...

See. I told you so.

All my love too.

pdore said...

Thank you Eric!!! That was an amazing reply!!! "I will now attack the central point of your post" - great stuff!! Wrong, of course, but it was still a noble, wonderful reply. I honour you (really) and appreciate that you did not say anything about my regard for "Dancing Queen".

That was so great what you said about the restlessness. I think we all loved the yearning. I still do, but for some reason got into the goofy smile more. Again, kind of embarrassing, but what can you do?

Still, there is the issue at hand.

So here is the question: Why do the Cramps suck? Did the band have less contempt for the bourgeois than Johnny Rotten? Was Slim Chance not as accomplished a bass player as Sid Vicious? Could the lyrics of "Jackyard Backoff" not match the lyrical depth of "Stand and Deliver" (da diddly qua qua). No, it's because LUX INTERIOR COULDN'T WRITE A DECENT MELODY TO SAVE HIS LIFE!!! God rest his soul.

Here is Arthur magazine's tribute to the band - presumably the best example that they could find:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ5PWflZ7y0&eurl=http://www.arthurmag.com/

Attitude? Sure. Fun to be there? Maybe. Listenable for more than 15 seconds? No!!! I remember what Lester Bangs said about Iggy - If it's so easy, why doesn't anybody else do it? Unfortunately, many did eventually...badly.

You're right about everything else,as usual (oh, except "Wonderwall"). Of course melody's not the only thing. There's gotta be some grime in there or you've got "Up up and away in my beautiful balloon". Do I need to clarify that I would not hold this up as the apotheosis of modern music? Am I not down wit OPP? Maybe less these days.

Did you know that the Muzak company filed for chapter 11 yesterday? Here is the Vulture article about it:

http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2009/02/rip_elevator_music_1934-2009.html

I remember hearing their "Smells Like Teen Spirit" once in a supermarket. It wasn't quite the same as I recall. Or maybe that was your story. I get them confused sometimes. But you get my point, right? That the, um, attitude and, uh...

Did you see this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoLm-vD89SQ&eurl=http://videogum.com/archives/late-night/norm-macdonald-on-conan_052001.html

So anyway, When I see Jerry, I'll appologize to him for you for putting him in there with those other two. And you're right about Allison Krauss - album of the year??? Joe Strummer's laughing somewhere. Finally, apologies to Bell for all of this - actually, "Bikini Girls with Machine Guns" is OK.

And I love you too Eric!!

Eric said...

Why do the Cramps suck?
Okay, I’ll agree that LUX INTERIOR COULDN'T WRITE A DECENT MELODY TO SAVE HIS LIFE!!! But that doesn’t satisfy me as a full justification of his suck.
(I want some kind of prize, because I just listened to an hour of Cramps and would like that time back.) It feels like it is not music, but a mockery of music. I enjoy a mockery as much as the next guy (probably more), but give me some variety, some wit, some soul. This music did not change over 30 years. They started with the concept, “Hey, let’s mock surf music and sing about debauchery!” and just rolled with it. It’s goth frat rock – no room for insight or emotion. The Clash are one of my favorite all-time bands, which explains why this music does nothing form me. They are the anti-Clash. No passion, no pushing the envelope. When you see how much the Clash morphed in 5 years, you have to wonder how anybody could keep pumping out the same thing for 30. Again, where is the restlessness?
Also, I admit I love “Dancing Queen.” Every note is just right. Nothing else ABBA did comes close, but they stumbled on sublimity there.
The Norm McDonald thing is awesome. His anecdote about the tourists is perfect. Now that is mockery.
Please open your blog again, before the serfs revolt.
I recommend that you not mention zombies in the next post, if avoidable. You’ve had them in your last two. Okay. I should be working.

Anonymous said...

I really miss you both. This brought back some fun memories of you and Eric sitting in the car having discussions that only you and he understood and yet were so funny and interesting.
I love you both.
Dad

Anonymous said...

This is why I the first album that I ever bought was Adam Ant's Prince Charming. I remember being in that car that Dad just mentioned and listening to you two (bro and Eric of course) singing Planet of the Apes (but as fast as possible). I thought it was the coolest thing ever. When I did buy the album and listened to the real song I was a bit disappointed by the laid back pace of it. I liked your version better. More restless! You two were my Lester Bangs. Thanks for showing your lil sis what good music is.

AND I'm with Em...I don't understand about 1/3 of what you two are yapping on about. But still love you both!

Amy Ant

pdore said...

OK, no zombies on this one. I'm glad you liked the Norm Macdonald - "Hey are you talking about Melrose Place?" has had me giggling since I saw it two days ago. It's been fun sparring with you, now get back to work.



AN HOUR?????? You're crazy.

Peace & Love.

Anonymous said...

Ok, as the only Cramps lover in the board, I feel I must jump in for some good old fashioned Lux lovin' (which will more than likely result in some kind of disease, but hey, who wants to live forever - besides, Lux & Ivy - totally worth the risk!).

The Cramps were, to steal a phrase from Hunter S Thompson "too weird to live, too rare to die" - one of their concerts was enough to keep you buzzing for days afterward - and there was no purer, more visceral rush to be found than to blast an album while leaping about the room, ripping your clothes, kicking and breaking your own belongings for the sheer joy of being a part of that horrible, wonderful cacophony. They dragged you in and wore you out and you were left sore and tired and begging for more. And they, like the dysfunctional, detached, self-absorbed entity they were, would let you – or not. Whatever. It was all the same to them. Which made you want them all the more. The Cramps were the boyfriend who never loved you back, the one you might find with your sister – or your brother – the one who made you cry but you always, always took back.

They loved their fans – in their fashion – but they loved what they did even more. They would have continued doing it in basements and dive clubs and garages if they hadn’t of bloomed like some strange hothouse flower in the greenhouse that was CBGB’s.

The Cramps…were like a portal into some other strange parallel world where everything was the wrong color, and it was so.freaking.wonderful. They lived over the top and under the influence – they invited you to come along, but didn’t really give a f*ck if you did or not. You were there for the ride, they were there because it was the world they had created and ruled like sickly, demented, utterly irresponsible and completely irrepresable gods. They snorted broken glass and shot jet fuel, and you were sad because you could never be a part of it, but happy because they were at least willing to let you watch.

High brow? Ummm…no. Unforgettable? Abso-f*cking-lutely.

Will I ever forget watching Ivy punch a roadie because he was trying to pull her rubber skirt down (it had ridden sloooowly up as she played) to cover what nature (or possibly some mad scientist) gave her? Nope!

Or Lux rolling around on the stage like he was being electrocuted, every muscle standing out in stark relief against his bones, screaming until he was hoarse, and screaming right along with him until I was hoarse?

An hour? Bah! I’ll be loving them for a lifetime. And they might love me back some day. Or not...

Eric said...

Alright, Bell wins. It's hard to match such passion and eloquence with my clinical snobbery. You rock, Bell. Doesn't make me like the Cramps any more, but you certainly sold me on the idea that I am missing something that the fans really get. And Happy Birthday, too.

Em said...

True, although she did neglect to mention that she also loves 'Dancing Queen'. Maybe that song is some sort of strange musical vortex that sucks everyone in.

Hope you're having the time of your life, Bell, wherever you are. Love you!

pdore said...

Nobley conceded!